The Physics of Proton Therapy
Protons are particles located in the nucleus of atoms. Their positive magnetic charge is balanced by the negative charge of the electrons that orbit around the atom. Unlike the electrons, protons have mass, which is to say, weight. If I were an electron (175-pounds), my corresponding proton would weigh sixty tons. Tons! Hence, protons behave very differently from x-rays, which have negligible mass.
Hydrogen is the best source of protons as it is the most common element in the universe having a single electron (negative charge), a single proton (positive charge), and no neutrons. Atoms are categorized by their atomic number, which is determined by the number of protons. Hence, hydrogen is number 1.
For proton therapy, hydrogen electrons are drawn off, leaving only the positively charged protons. Called ions, these adulterated atoms are typically shown as H+. In the table of elements, you can see both the atomic number (how many protons/electrons) and the atomic weight (which includes neutrons, which have no charge). When you change the number of neutrons, the atomic number stays the same, and the atom is called an isotope. Look at uranium, with an atomic number of 92 and a weight of 238. If you read the section about proton therapy history (see HISTORY) you will recall that they sought to isolate the U-235 isotope for making an atomic bomb.
Note, only the first 94 elements exist in nature. The rest are artificial. Note also that the bottom line of the chart indicates the elements are radioactive. This happens because of imbalances in the nucleus, which lead to the emission of ionizing particles or rays (gamma, etc.). These are what a Geiger counter picks up when checking to see if something is radioactive.
Hydrogen ions (H+) have a positive charge. If you have ever held two magnets together, you may have noticed that the like poles repel each other. H+ ions would do the same thing, except that strong magnets force them into an organized into a beam.
First, however, the protons circle around and around in a cyclotron until they reach two-thirds the speed of light. How fast is that? They could circle the earth five times in one second. ONE second!
It is most practical to understand proton therapy as it compares to x-rays, so let’s talk about them for a moment. X-rays are high-energy photons (light waves). Gamma rays are also weightless packets of photons, but usually of higher energy. X-rays and gamma rays have the same basic properties but come from different parts of the atom. X-rays are emitted from processes outside the nucleus (see illustration) whereas gamma rays originate inside the nucleus.
Some kinds of radiation, such as radio waves or visible light, do not damage other atoms when they are in contact. Higher energy radiation, such as x-rays, have the power to knock electrons away from an atom. As we noted, atoms with fewer electrons are called ions; so this process is called ionization. It is for that reason that x-rays and gamma rays require shielding with lead or concrete. In the human body, they can destabilize tissues. For the cancer cells, that’s great, but for healthy cells, that’s a problem. Because of the different techniques and characteristics, proton therapy has proven to be less damaging than photons. (Protons also give off harmful radiation contained within thick walls of concrete.)
Here is a statement from the Mayo Clinic website from an article published in 2021:
Because doctors can better control where proton therapy releases its highest concentration of energy, it's believed to affect less healthy tissue and have fewer side effects than traditional radiation therapy.
For the entire article, see:
https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/proton-therapy/about/pac-20384758
Such a conclusion turns out to be controversial. Some say proton therapy represents a medical arms race, a mistaken quest for identity, or an overpriced modality not worth the cost. For more about that, see the essay on problems and issues (see ISSUES).
Take a moment to consider the Mayo Clinic, one of the largest and most reputable medical establishments in the world. Early on they established proton therapy centers at their campuses in Arizona and Minnesota at a cost of almost $200 million each. The Rochester, Minnesota, proton center is being enlarged at a cost of $100 million. Plus the Mayo Clinic is building a new center in Florida costing more than $200 million that will have both proton therapy and carbon ion therapy. Do you really think they are just doing this for status? Or to keep up with their competition? Or have been deceived as to the efficacy of these technologies? Not hardly. Or would you suspect they might know what they are doing by embracing proton therapy?
The Florida campus of the Mayo Clinic will have the first center for carbon ion therapy in the United States (and one of only a few in the world). It is even more complex and expensive than proton therapy, but works in essentially the same way. Because carbon atoms are bigger (atomic number = 6, atomic weight = 12), their ions wander even less, and destroy cancer even more efficiently than proton therapy.
On the other hand, consider how x-rays work. Because they have so little mass (being photons of light), when x-rays go through the body, they get deflected or go astray. Therefore, to have the full number of x-rays reach the target (say, a malignant tumor), you must start with a higher dose, perhaps as much as 60% more, to make up for the x-rays that go astray. That means the healthy tissue in front of the target gets a higher dose of radiation than the cancer itself. Then, after hitting the target, x-rays keep going until they exit the other side of the body.
Protons act much differently. Having mass, they don’t stray to the extent of x-rays. Further, as they enter the body (at a much lower dose), they pick up electrons to balance their positive charge. This process of electron gathering slows down the protons until suddenly, they recover all of their electrons in a big burst of energy, which we have already noted is called the Bragg’s Peak. Not only does this burst ionize the cancer cells (by stealing their electrons), the protons also physically break the strands of DNA.
In this chart, the downward slope represents x-rays, in which the dose starts at its strongest point and then diminishes. Protons start at a lower dose, reach a sudden peak and then stop. To cover the entire target, there are a series of overlapping peaks, known as the spread out Bragg’s Peak (SOBP). The cancer’s DNA is corrupted, stopping it from reproducing. Protons also physically damage the cancer’s DNA, breaking the helical strands. I portrayed this on the cover of one of my books (see BOOKS).
This is all very straightforward, yet remains controversial, mostly because to resistance by traditional x-ray radiologists. This resistance has led to many roadblocks for proton therapy, which is covered in the essay on issues. (See ISSUES.)
A proton and an x-ray stop at a bar on the way home from the cyclotron. After they’ve had a couple of drinks, the bartender comes around and asks if they want another round. In slurred speech the x-ray says, “Sure, let’s keep going.” The proton demurs, saying, “No thanks. I know when to stop.”
The next day an atom and a proton stop at the same bar. More drinking ensues, causing the atom to fall off of its bar stool. “Are you okay?” asked the proton. “No,” said the atom, “I think I lost an electron.” “Oh,” said the proton, “that would be terrible. Are you sure?” The atom replied, “I’m positive.” (Get it?)
Consider a target shaped like a “U” wrapped around a vital organ. With protons, you can treat half of the “U” from one side (then stop) and half from the other side (then stop) without radiating the inside of the “U.” With x-rays, the beam goes right across the “U” and radiates the vital organ in the middle. Because they stop, protons have access to difficult areas where x-rays would be too damaging. For more details, see the essay describing which cancers can be treated with proton therapy (see CANCERS).
Now that we know what protons can do, let’s look more deeply into the technology itself. Essentially, proton therapy requires a source of protons, an accelerator to ramp up the energy, a selection system to adjust the energy level, a magnet-controlled vacuum line to transport the protons, a delivery system, and a positioning system, and a patient.
An electric charge zaps hydrogen gas to ionize it. Magnets draw off the positively charged protons and inject them into a cyclotron or synchrotron to accelerate them. Physicists measure proton energy in electron volts, eV, using MeV to represent a million electron volts. Cyclotrons can energize protons as much as 250 MeV or as low as 70 MeV.
There are various devices to adjust the energy level of the proton beam, which determines how deep it can go into the body. Sometimes this is done at the beginning of the beam line (using a degrader), and sometimes at the nozzle end (range shifter) or both. Once at the proper energy level, the protons travel down a vacuum beam line (to keep them from contamination from ambient air) constantly being shaped and controlled by magnets. The quality and consistency of the beam are of the utmost importance. Twenty-four hours a day engineers monitor, test and calibrate the beam.
To revolve the proton beam 360 degrees around the treatment table looks simple enough. The patient sees a moveable nozzle that rotates with the push of a button. However, behind the wall looms a huge gantry, three stories tall, weighing anywhere from fifty to one hundred tons, all of which turns along with the nozzle. Some smaller systems use a different technology that only rotates 180 degrees and calls for a smaller gantry. In other cases, there is no gantry, just a fixed beam, with a means for moving the patient into the right position.
At this point, the protons reach the cancer target. There are two basic ways to do this with protons, an older technology called double scanning and a more recent development called pencil beam scanning (PBS). The illustrations below show how they work.
Uniform double scanning shapes a beam to conform to the target, hitting the whole target at once. Note the extraneous blue area in front of the target. Many thousands of people received this technology with excellent results. Then PBS came along. It lays down tiny spots in rows and layers until the whole target is precisely covered. As you can see, these conform better to the target and affect less healthy tissue. When PBS came along, the number of cancers treatable by proton therapy increased from 20% to 80%. Quite the big deal.
There are many exciting developments taking place with proton therapy. How about a single treatment lasting less than one second and you are finished? That is becoming a reality. Check out the latest innovations here:
FUTURE
To read my advice for choosing a proton therapy center, read this. Also, proton therapy centers have extensive websites explaining proton therapy and cancers treated (as well as research and trials underway), often with excellent videos and graphics. See:
CENTERS
HOME PAGE
MAIN PROTON THERAPY PAGE
Manufacturers of proton therapy equipment also have informative websites, which are listed in the links section. See:
LINKS PAGE